Candidate Performance Report
Candidate Name: Daniel Gibaud Transcript Id: 2999003
Exam Name: ECPI Six Sigma Green Belt Certification Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2015
Score: 9
Percentile: 85
Result: Pass
Overall Performance
Passing Score
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Score
Weak
Average
Above Average
Good
Expert
Sub-scale Performance
Sub-scale Name
Weak

(0-7)
Average

(7-8)
Above Average
(8-8.5)
Good

(8.5-9)
Expert

(9-10)
Six Sigma-Analyze
Sub-scale score out of 10: 10
Six Sigma-Control
Sub-scale score out of 10: 9
Six Sigma-Define
Sub-scale score out of 10: 10
Six Sigma-Improve
Sub-scale score out of 10: 10
Six Sigma-Introduction
Sub-scale score out of 10: 8
Six Sigma-Measure
Sub-scale score out of 10: 9
Efficiency
Accuracy
Speed
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Accuracy:
The candidate has obtained good score in accuracy.
Speed:
The candidate has obtained weak score in speed.
Efficiency:
Based on the collective scores of accuracy and speed, the overall efficiency of the candidate is good.
Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
Six Sigma-Analyze
Six Sigma-Control
Six Sigma-Define
Six Sigma-Improve
Six Sigma-Introduction
Six Sigma-Measure
Weaknesses
No evident Weaknesses

The results of this test show that Daniel is very well suited for job profiles, which require knowledge of Six Sigma-Analyze, Six Sigma-Control, Six Sigma-Define, Six Sigma-Improve, Six Sigma-Introduction, Six Sigma-Measure as the core competencies.
Job Suitability
The analysis of Daniel’s performance in this test in terms of speed and accuracy with which he/ she attempted this test reveals that he/ she is good at accuracy as compared to other test takers and the time taken for completing the test was very high. If you require a candidate who is good at understanding problems and drawing accurate inferences, and the job is not time critical, then Daniel may be shortlisted.
Disclaimer:
The results of this report are intended to serve as general guidelines only and should be used in combination with other recruitment tools such as evaluation of academic performance, employment history, and personality. The candidate’s performance on this test depends on a number of factors and ExpertRating does not guarantee same or similar results in the future or in a different test setting.
Copyright © 2012 ExpertRating Solutions.